July 2020

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30 31  
Blog powered by Typepad

« Happy Thanksgiving 2013 | Main | "You can blow out a candle, But you can't blow out a fire; Once the flames begin to catch, The wind will blow it higher" »

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Check out the Ed West Centre where Pauline is based. http://egwestcentre.com/
West was a Canadian-born libertarian. He did some great historical work on the amount of private education provided by "penny schools" in Britain and the American colonies prior to the statist public education movement. In some places the literacy rate was higher due to the penny schools than the results from modern public education. Go figure!

The importance of private education for economic development has been well-recognized at the more local level for some time. Private missions in the inner city have been doing this work for decades. Thinking *too* globally has caused many to forget the effectiveness of this work, such that private schools in the city are neglected among charitable organizations supported by philanthropies.
Anthony Bradley has been writing about this for a few years now.

Someone should inform the pope about this.

Mario Rizzo.

Foreign educational aid is a really good way to help developing countries. I’m come from Vietnam which is a developing country. There are a lot of international schools in Vietnam that teach in new ways (new technology, more application of science in reality) and all the subject are taught in English. It’s good for young generation in developing country to learn in a new, modern environment. And it’s easier for them to study abroad because they have a strong background of English. But the problem is after they study abroad, will they come back to Vietnam? If developing countries didn’t have any plan to keep talents that studied abroad coming back to their home countries, it’s easier for industrialized countries like USA to keep them. As a result, developing countries would lose a number of talents who begin studying in their countries but study abroad lately and stay in a industrialized country to work and be a part of labor forces of that country. To prevent it from happening, developing countries should have plans that not only attract other countries to invest money in education but also keeps talents that were taught and transmitted new idea, new technology in their own countries to help developing countries reach to industrialized faster.

On the other hand,too much education is dangerous. The "Arab Spring" happened to a large degree because of thousands of unemployed college grads. The Arab world has offered free college education for decades, but their socialist economies failed to create jobs to absorb them.

The guy in Tunisia who set himself on fire and launched the Arab revolutions was an unemployed college grad.

Education does not create economic development. My state, Oklahoma, is a perfect example. For 40 years the state has tried to grow its economy by educating everyone. Growth has been very slow. Unemployment has remained low because the unemployed leave the state. Our biggest export is college grads.

Education is such a really important element of any country's development. Because if people had a strong base of knowledge, they would know and use it to help growing their own country. Especially poor countries, they should take care of this issue. They should invest more on educating children. If not, children would grow with low knowledge level and become unemployed. But to help the country to be industrialized and to be developed we need people who have strong knowledge about technology, new manufacturing...And to have all of those of course people do need to be schooled. The government should not cut off any expenses, budgets of the education. The government should know the value of it. It is the best component of helping developing any country.

Ngoc, it is not just a matter of spending more money on education. It has been quite clear since Peter Bauer's work which commenced in the 1940s that foreign aid to governments of the Third World has for the most part (leaving out direct medical care) done more harm that good. No just no good. Harm.
The point of this argument on education is that the education has to be relevant to the needs of the people where they live and work. That is most effectively delivered by educators who respond to the immediate needs of the people where they live and work. Simply putting more funds into a government line item called Education means next to nothing in terms of delivering the specific kind of education that is required on the ground.

Rafe, the McKinsey Institute has a good paper on the value of education to development that says only on-the-job training works. General education such as what people get in K-12 and college is almost useless.

Other than OJT, education does not cause development; it is a result of development as people with more money want better education.

Yes, misplaced education is not just a problem in the Third World, a great many of the people in western universities would do better with on the job training. Too many courses make people come out more stupid than they went in, and far too many people in ok courses are not genuinely interested enough to get real value from the course.

How many people in non-vocational courses attend the lectures because they are really interested in the subject, and how many are there just because they need the points to complete the course?

Jacques Barzun saw it all happening between 1943 when he published Teacher in America and 1968 when he published The American University who took any notice?

By the way you can get his books these days for next to nothing.

http://www.abebooks.com/servlet/SearchResults?an=Jacques+Barzun&fromanz=fromanz&sortby=17&x=44&y=7

This post was an enlightening one indeed. Misplaced education is a topic i know very little about yet the point of it makes sense. The education systems in third world countries will never prove to turn out students who are exceeding the standards of the fellow students. Entrepreneurial expansion in the poorer countries applies incentives for creating and expanding knowledge which would promote positive education changes in third world countries.

The focus of education must always be to grow and make society better not just a regiment that all people must suffer through. Education must be government better in order to streamline the use of its resources.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Our Books