|Peter Boettke|
Lionel Robbins in his introduction to Philip Wicksteed's classic, The Common-Sense of Political Economy, first explains Wicksteed's exposition of individual maximzing behavior and the optimaility conditions associated with system equilibrium. Maximizing and optimality are vital concepts in understanding economic systems. But Robbin's adds an interesting caveat, especially given that it was written in 1932, as he distinguished between Wicksteed and Pareto. "Wicksteed's approach is by no means the same as Pareto's. His analysis of conditions of equilibrium is much less an end in itself, much more a tool with which to explain tendencies of any given situation. He was much more concerned with economic phenomena as a process in time, much less with its momentary end-products." (p. xix).
Prices do their job through time as they guide accomodating adjustments on both sides of the market through relative price changes. As the blogosphere explodes with discussions of how new money works its way into the economy, and the Washington DC community of pundits and politicians devise policy schemes to avoid the fiscal cliff, Marketplace yesterday afternoon ran a fascinating story about guar gum which captures in my mind the essence of market theory and the price system. Guar gum is an important ingredient in fracking. In 2010, the guar gum bean was sold for $1/pound on the world market, but due to the explosion of hydraulic fracking over the past few years the price for guar gum had risen by early 2012 to $12/pound. This induced action on multiple margins. Yes Virginia, this is economics forces at work (emphasis intended and necessary).
In this instances, higher prices for guar gum resulted in (a) quest to find alternatives to the guar gum bean for the role in played in fracking, (b) reduced consumption of guar gum, and (c) an inducement to farmers to increase production of guar gum. As quickly as guar gum prices spiked, they fell back almost to 2010 levels. Guar gum in once again cheaper than the substitute products that were developed to be used in fracking.
This story captures so much about the "marvel of the market" and the price system. And it stresses how that system works through time. Prices have to be free to do their job. But they don't do their job instantaneously. Economics forces are always at work, and in a dynamic sense their work is never done.
What implications would you draw for monetary economics of this understanding of how the price system works through time?
As Hayek would put it, Bill Woolsey's and Scott Sumner's magical instant expectational coordination via the EMH or Rational Expectations assumes away the very problem of to be explained.
It's a form of begging the question -- the whole problem of macroeconomic coordination it so explain how coordinational expectations across plans works and fails to work Sumner and Woolsey.
Here's the question begging argument of Sumner and Woolsey:
The magic of the market works .. via magic.
Posted by: Greg Ransom | December 07, 2012 at 10:27 AM
この人は「素人感」っていうAKBのコンセプトにはまってたんだな
Posted by: ルイヴィトンコピー | December 08, 2012 at 09:37 AM
Don't forget the biggest beneficiaries--the farmers in Northern India
Posted by: Asif Dowla | December 09, 2012 at 09:55 PM
Certainly those selling guar gum in 2011, those buying their farm in 2011 might have a different take on just how beneficial things were for them.
Posted by: John | December 13, 2012 at 06:48 PM
Hey there! I've been following your weblog for a long time now and finally got the bravery to go ahead and give you a shout out from Atascocita Texas! Just wanted to tell you keep up the excellent work!|
Posted by: sand and building supplies | December 27, 2012 at 01:24 PM
kmjzfkbmys
Posted by: xxfxiwat | December 28, 2012 at 08:40 PM