|Peter Boettke|
Here is a new interview from UFM.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 |
« Address to those graduating with honors from UFM (May 2012) | Main | Prosperity Follows Not From Privileges Nor From Predation But From Protection Of Property Rights »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
Excellent interview! In addition Poverty Cure is implementing Boettke's ideas on reducing poverty:
"PovertyCure is an international coalition of organizations and individuals committed to entrepreneurial solutions to poverty that challenge the status quo and champion the creative potential of the human person." http://www.acton.org/pub/religion-liberty/volume-21-number-4/whats-behind-povertycure
Posted by: McKinney | May 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM
Thanks for the feedback!Weber's cotmimment to marginal utility is seen in his piece Marginal Utility and the Fundamental Law of Psychophysics. Also, Weber strongly believed that both sociology and economics needed each other. Sociologists need, according to Weber, coherent theoretical constructs to assist in understanding social phenomena. Economists, on the other hand, must appreciate that motivations, other than monetary, must be incorporated into the arguments of actors' utility functions. Especially when economists are exploring human action outside of markets. Weber, in short, believed that purposiveness (or the pure logic of choice) should be the theoretical guide for understanding human action outside of markets. Weber, to be sure, was a student of Schmoller, but he was unquestionably a Mengerian-Misesian!
Posted by: riyanto | June 10, 2012 at 07:15 AM