|Peter Boettke|
HT: Jayme Lemke
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 |
« Human Nature's Pathologist | Main | New Issue of The Freeman »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
Any transcript?
Posted by: Niko | December 01, 2011 at 01:22 AM
Something was stated in this interview, almost in an offhanded way, but it really caught my attention. Lin Ostrom states that in most cases, she did not pre-plan the formation of a collaborative group on purpose, but rather such working groups sometimes sort of spontaneously emerged out of necessity demanded by the pursuit of knowledge. Yet sometimes, these turned out to be extremely productive.
This speaks to a problem I have been thinking about regarding the scientific research that occurs in an idealized "free market" of ideas vs the usually planned research which often occurs in very large public corporations. In the setting of corporate research, most often teams of scientists are assembled by a supervisor or a manager. Too often these end up failing miserably. Yet designed governmental processes within an organization demand that the management structure within the company masterminds the construction of a team of specialists.
My own experience seems to bear out that the most productive collaborations in my career have likewise "just happened", and were governed only by certain shared "values" or work ethic, and a realization that through a division of labor, we might go further than we could be proceeding alone.
Posted by: K Sralla | December 25, 2011 at 01:44 PM