About

Recent Posts

Archives

October 2021

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30
31            
Blog powered by Typepad
Subscribe to this blog's feed

« Struggling with Success | Main | Nobel Prize as Leading or Lagging Indicator; or perhaps just a wake up call for those who lost their intellectual way in economics »

Are police services too important to be left to governmental provision?

|Peter Boettke|

Ed Stringham discusses the economics and historical record on private provision of police services.

 

Posted by on October 26, 2011 at 09:50 PM |

|

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Bonjour,

Non toujours pas et ça m’énerve !!! mais je cherche je m’approche et à chaque fois les conversation se termine avant mm de dire comment faire vraiment pas de chance.

Posted by: calvin klein pull | October 27, 2011 at 06:31 AM

Ed is right to point out that the poor would benefit most from relaxing restrictions on competition in policing. See his chapter in the NCPA's Enterprise Programs report:
http://www.ncpa.org/pdfs/Enterprise-Programs-Freeing-Entrepreneurs-to-Provide-Essential-Services-for-the-Poor.pdf

The 1% don't need competitive markets, just the opposite. The least among us have the greatest need of market competition, as the Enterprise Programs report suggests.

Posted by: Roger Koppl | October 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM

Thanks to Roger for the link. States and localities routinely restrict private provision of needed public services. It's an issue that the Institute for Justice has repeatedly litigated.

Posted by: Jerry O'Driscoll | October 27, 2011 at 04:03 PM

The comments to this entry are closed.

Search

Our Books