Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
« Sorry Jonathan Chait, but Labor is NOT Fungible; or Best Blog Comment I Read Today | Main | The Legacy of Smith and Hayek: Free The Market »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
That's great! Thanks!
Posted by: McKinney | September 02, 2011 at 10:07 AM
Where can I find the best Austrian take down of the Lucas inspired claim that economists can never say that the economy is in an Austrian business cycle disequilibrium because, as Stephen Williamson puts it:
"The economic agents living in a model in which a financial crisis can occur know that there is a possibility that this event can happen. But they cannot predict it, otherwise there would be an unexploited profit opportunity. Similarly, a real human being could not have used such a model to predict the financial crisis."
This is but one version of the jumbled Lucas critique / Efficient Market Hypothesis which economists use to say that there can be no systematic distortion in the structure of relative prices across the time structure of production (and consumption).
Again, where can I find the best and most complete Austrian take down of this "critique" of Austrian business cycle theory.
Posted by: Greg Ransom | September 02, 2011 at 03:24 PM
Greg,
Mario and I dealt with this issue in chap. 9 of Time & Ignorance, "The Microanalytics of Money." See especially pp.213-26, where we deal with rational expectations.
Posted by: Jerry O'Driscoll | September 02, 2011 at 08:51 PM
Thanks Jerry. It's been a very long time since I read your book. I'll take a look.
Posted by: Greg Ransom | September 03, 2011 at 02:56 AM