|Peter Boettke|
Many have probably already seen this, but here is the video that was played at the University of Chicago School of Law conference on "Markets, Firms and Property Rights" from last fall.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
« Do Airport Security Measures Cause More Deaths Than They Prevent? | Main | Books I am Staring At Right Now That I Plan to Read Over the Next Few Weeks »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
Enjoyed the video thoroughly.
His last point -- that life and business do not much depend on contract (in the narrow sense) -- I found most important. Something Shleifer needs to learn.
A classic on the matter:
Macauley, Stewart, "Non-Contractual Relations in Business: A Preliminary Study," AmSociologicalRev 55:55-69.
Posted by: Daniel Klein | February 04, 2010 at 01:07 PM
My God. What a genius even at 99. One of the most interesting parts is at the very end when he talks about the non-explicit aspects of contracts. This could easily lead into the socialist calculation issue.
And then he has a good sense of humor.
Boy, we are lucky to have him among us.
Posted by: Mario Rizzo | February 04, 2010 at 07:02 PM
Do any of you know what Posner's connection between Keynes and Coase ended up being?
Phil Agre, former professor whose whereabouts are unknown, had an argument contrasting Smithian and Coasean visions of the economy. I haven't read Smith's or Coase's books, but it seemed to me Agre was misrepresenting them. More knowledgeable readers are welcome to comment:
http://entitledtoanopinion.wordpress.com/2009/11/26/how-much-slack-should-we-give-thinkers/#comment-4806
Posted by: TGGP | February 04, 2010 at 08:59 PM
TGGP,
Agre --- I imagine the argument is probably something about atomistic markets (Smith) and positive transaction costs markets (Coase). And yes it is a misreading of both.
On Posner and the link between Keynes and Coase --- read his interview with John Casidy in the New Yorker, it is about lack of mathematical reasoning and thinking seriously about dynamics and the institutional details in an economy.
Posner and Coase in the Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics had a debate on methodology where Posner criticizes Coase for many of the same things he now praises him for. It is his counter-reaction to the hyper-formalization of Chicago macroeconomics.
Pete
Posted by: Peter Boettke | February 05, 2010 at 04:49 PM
TGGP,
BTW, impossible is a claim directed at the relationship between means and ends, not a statement about existence.
Pete
Posted by: Peter Boettke | February 05, 2010 at 04:51 PM
Dear Admin,thank you for this informative article.It's very good
Posted by: mbt shoes | February 07, 2010 at 09:25 PM
this blog is good information
Posted by: tika sumarti | February 19, 2010 at 10:33 PM
Being active, creative and innonative is a .With good managerial skills and organizational capabilities.Good presentation skills.Energetic,fashion-minded person.
Posted by: air max shoes | May 26, 2010 at 05:28 AM
When he states that "markets are created" I'm reminded of when we used to raise miniature horses.
People would ask us what they were good for. I knew that inherently they weren't good for much at all, but because of 'perceived value'(a created market), we got a pretty penny for them.
Posted by: Cycling Shoes | June 12, 2010 at 07:28 PM
When he states that "markets are created" I'm reminded of when we used to raise miniature horses.
People would ask us what they were good for. I knew that inherently they weren't good for much at all, but because of 'perceived value'(a created market), we got a pretty penny for them.
Posted by: air jordan | June 18, 2010 at 03:28 AM
Thanks for your sharing!http://www.gucci-outlet.us/ gucci handbags outlet great helpful!!!Thank you
why do not you have a look at our website
thank you !! I am pleased to share my joy with you?
love bags.
http://www.gucci-outlet.us/ gucci handbags outlet
http://www.gucci-outlet.us/ gucci outlet
http://www.gucci-outlet.us/ gucci handbags
http://www.coach-bags-outlet.com/ coach bags outlet
http://www.coach-bags-outlet.com/ coach bags
http://www.coach-bags-outlet.com/ coach outlet
zocy005 on 2010-7-9
Posted by: coach bags outlet | July 09, 2010 at 03:53 AM
This is a good article, I like it very much.
Posted by: michael jordan shoes | August 16, 2010 at 06:19 AM
Pretty good post, this is one of the best aritcles that I have ever seen! This is a great site and I have to congratulate you on the content. I appreciate it!
Posted by: Discount MBT Shoes | September 24, 2010 at 11:41 PM
Thanks for sharing. I want to see this film "Markets, Firms and Property Rights" . Maybe I will benefit from this story.
Posted by: christian louboutin | October 21, 2010 at 02:28 AM
1.Everyone should have a love.Because love is pure.
Posted by: mesos sale | November 16, 2010 at 03:18 AM
1.Everyone should have a love.Because love is pure.
Posted by: runescape sale | November 16, 2010 at 03:19 AM
BTW, impossible is a claim directed at the relationship between means and ends, not a statement about existence.
Posted by: Packers jerseys | January 21, 2011 at 04:25 AM
who studied Law and worked as a flight attendant before making a foray into modelling, films and TV anchoring. This Marathi mulgi made a stunning Bollywood debut in Vikram Bhatts Inteha (2003) and followed it up with Footpath (2003), Mashooka (2005) and the English flick U, Bomsi N Me. She has ruled the ad world too, working with some of the biggest names like SRK, Akshay Kumar and Govinda.nike air max 2010 Catched up with this self-professed non-techie as she narrates her tech woes and subsequent gritty attempts to get over them. Here are the excerpts.
Posted by: nike air max | March 05, 2011 at 01:38 AM
Pretty good post, this is one of the best aritcles that I have ever seen!
Posted by: ClubPenguinCheats | March 22, 2011 at 03:53 AM
Many have probably already seen this, but here is the video that was played at the University of Chicago School of Law conference on. I am sorry but i have to agree
Posted by: Spin Bikes For Sale | March 22, 2011 at 12:12 PM