|Peter Boettke|
In a recent interview Stephen Dubner is asked what message from the Freakonomics books does he hope readers walk away with, and he argued: "That incentives matter. And that cheap and simple fixes are vastly underappreciated."
He was also asked what books he would recommend to readers to learn the power of economic reasoning and he listed Tim Harford, Gary Becker, Robert Frank, Steven Landsburg, and the Marginal Revolution blog, and younger writers like Peter Leeson.
I enjoyed Freakonomics, but to me the Super version seems like a re-write of Harford's and Becker's stuff. I think it is less engaging and less interesting than both - although it does have good moments.
Perhaps it is like a difficult second album.
Posted by: Mykirznernumberisfour | February 11, 2010 at 07:47 AM
I've given multiple people copies of Tim Harford's The Undercover Economist as gifts. I find its the type of book that gives you little insights into everyday life. Great book to get people thinking about economics, easy and interesting read.
Posted by: Jasper | February 11, 2010 at 08:08 AM
Henry Hazlitt, Economics in One Lesson. I read this book in high school because I was "lazy" and wanted to learn economics quickly. It changed my life.
Posted by: Mario Rizzo | February 11, 2010 at 11:17 AM
Thomas Sowell's "Basic Economics" was the first book about economics that I read. I learned a great deal from that book in a very short amount of time; it is no nonsense and excellently written.
Posted by: Lee Kelly | February 11, 2010 at 11:57 AM
It occurred to me: What has happened so that "incentives matter" is informative?
Posted by: Mario Rizzo | February 11, 2010 at 06:22 PM
I'd show this beer ad to a high school econ class to drive in the point that incentivs matter:
http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1125919467?bctid=63259762001
Chris Lemens
Posted by: Chris Lemens | February 12, 2010 at 12:49 PM
The ad is quite good.
Posted by: Mario Rizzo | February 13, 2010 at 02:59 PM