The other day I posted about the then upcoming lecture of Dani Rodrik, well the lecture has come and gone, but economists Anthony Evans was in attendence and provides this report.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
« Don't Let the Fox Guard the Chicken Coop | Main | Keynes versus Hayek --- Round 78! »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
Why Rodrik's talk is worth listening to:
We currently live a state indistinguishable from pure anarchy -
http://arare-litus.blogspot.com/2009/06/what-happens-when-bullies-confront.html
Each "anarchic" group is pushed up to their neighbors, and are interacting. Now what?
Posted by: Arare Litus | June 17, 2009 at 05:57 PM
Besides the fact that he is at Harvard, this review doesn't much convince that Rodrik has much to say that people need to pay attention to. I ask again, besides the self-evident fact of his power within the profession, what does Rodrik bring to the table that is both 1) new and 2) important.
I'm sure it something. It can't be simply that Rodrik thinks "institutions" are important, other than perhaps the significance of having the power of Harvard as a platform for saying this.
Posted by: Greg Ransom | June 17, 2009 at 10:21 PM
Greg,
"It can't be simply that Rodrik thinks "institutions" are important".
True, though he fills a nice niche between two camps and uses arbitrage to gain insights from each camp and this does go a long way, I believe, in explaining his popularity - simply having an open mind towards ideas and data is surprisingly rare in academia.
I, like you, would like to hear the economic insiders say something on this - but to me, it seems his import is taking constraints on growth seriously, as well as taking a wide view and finding interesting patterns in order to discuss economics. i.e. he sees economics as a study of human society, versus just dry applied math, and he seriously studies stories and examples in order to glean insights.
To me, Dani's success is due to a sharp and open mind, a deep respect for narrative and a search for economic insights from such narrative, and his niche between two camps - the "right" and the "left" - where he takes the best of both worlds. Oh, yeah, he is also a very clear writer and can use mathematics in a clear and useful way.
Posted by: Arare Litus | June 18, 2009 at 10:22 AM
Blogs are so informative where we get lots of information on any topic. Nice job keep it up!!
Posted by: Doctoral Dissertation | October 31, 2009 at 11:05 AM
Thanks a lot for a bunch of good tips. I look forward to reading more on the topic in the future. Keep up the good work! This blog is going to be great resource. Love reading it.
Posted by: writing a term paper | January 29, 2010 at 05:27 AM
Using forex robots in this age has become a fashion for online traders. It could be use as another effective tool to minimize risk. But it is not the 100% solution for 100% effectivity. A trader should spend at least 6 hours of his time daily to make any automated tool the reason of trading success!
Posted by: Forex Robots | July 10, 2010 at 06:49 AM
This is a very nice blog,I have seen this variety of post after a elongated moment. I value your endeavor for compiling such post.
Posted by: Dissertation Writing Service | September 21, 2010 at 06:35 AM