I hate it I hate it.
I'm off to play my fiddle.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
« This Ain't Working | Main | Best Thought for the Weekend --- Don Boudreaux's Letter to the Editor Edition of the Plea to Read Hayek »
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
It is interesting that some banks are refusing the bailout: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090129/ap_on_bi_ge/meltdown_no_thanks, as the contractual terms are not agreed.
Posted by: Anamaria Berea | January 30, 2009 at 12:09 PM
Pyrchitko fiddled while our tax dollars burned.
Posted by: Stewart | January 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM
The last 4 words in the opening paragraph are highly descriptive... "and for other purposes".
Posted by: lbutler | January 30, 2009 at 12:10 PM
How carefully did the members of the House of Representatives read this? I think we all know the answer. The stimulus frame-of-mind is further degrading democracy. You cannot have this kind of vast planning in a representative democracy. This is the real reason why Obama wants his program approved by mid-February and no later. Were the package to be carefully studied the "consensus" would break down.
Posted by: Mario Rizzo | January 30, 2009 at 12:32 PM
Fiddling? Nice call Stewart:)
Dave, are you out of logs to split?
Posted by: Rafe Champion | January 30, 2009 at 07:57 PM
Yes, no more logs for now -- all split, weathered, and piled.
In addition to running off and fiddling (which, by the way, I've always said I'm not a good fiddler), I also sleep, play board games with my kids (and ice skate, etc with them, too), take my wife out to dinner, read poetry, and on and on, all while our tax dollars are burned. I wonder if you all think I should devote 100% of my time to economics, my profession.
$-)
Posted by: Dave Prychitko | January 31, 2009 at 08:05 AM
Several months ago I think I mentioned Don Lavoie's National Economic Planning: What is Left? His critique of Indicative Planning, etc., is once again as relevant now as it was when it emerged in the U.S. during the late 70s and early 80s.
Posted by: Dave Prychitko | January 31, 2009 at 08:15 AM