Bill Easterly's latest piece, in today's Los Angeles Times, is motivated by the Africa issue of Vanity Fair. Easterly notes:
...the international development establishment is rigging the game to make Africa — which is, of course, still very poor — look even worse than it really is. It announces, for instance, that Africa is the only region that is failing to meet the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs in aid-speak) set out by the United Nations. Well, it takes extraordinary growth to cut extreme poverty rates in half by 2015 (the first goal) when a near-majority of the population is poor, as is the case in Africa. (Latin America, by contrast, requires only modest growth to halve its extreme poverty rate from 10% to 5%.)
And on motivations:
Why do aid organizations and their celebrity backers want to make African successes look like failures? One can only speculate, but it certainly helps aid agencies get more publicity and more money if problems seem greater than they are. As for the stars — well, could Africa be saving celebrity careers more than celebrities are saving Africa?
Thanks to Claire Morgan for the pointer.
This article really looks at the numbers regarding media coverage of Africa, and criticizes the celebrity focus.
http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=3119
You might also be interested in this recent essay, entitled "Africans to Bono: 'For God's sake please stop!'":
http://american.com/archive/2007/july-0707/africans-to-bono-for-gods-sake-please-stop
Posted by: Pablo | July 06, 2007 at 11:01 AM