« Could Deflation Be Salvation? |
| Carl Menger Essay Contest »
David Beckworth proposes a policy position designed to please both monetarists and fiscialists.
What do you think?
Posted by Peter Boettke on June 18, 2013 at 09:19 AM | Permalink
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The idea behind the helicopter drop is to "stabilize the price level" while avoid the distortionary effects of implementing government spending to increase the money supply, right? So effectively, the fed will announce an exchange rate and our banks will swap out the $100 worth of JuneDollars in our bank account and replace them with, say, $104 of JulyDollars?
Andrea Clark |
June 18, 2013 at 09:38 AM
If that's what gets the monetarists on board then that's great - whatever we can do. I have a chapter coming out in Guinevere Nell's book on basic income guarantees that discusses it in terms of the helicopter drop and offers reasons why from an Austrian perspective it might be an improvement on current policy. (I'm not entirely sold on a basic income guarantee myself - it was more of an interesting exercise to work through).
I'm less concerned about other types of spending than Beckworth is. Given state borrowing constraints a lot of the spending that goes on at the federal level is just a matter of keeping teachers paid. Beckworth's concerns don't seem to apply to that in quite the same way. Plus I think there's plenty of good stuff to do and we are quite far in practice from the point where the costs of corruption/boondoggles outweighs the macro and micro benefits of the work.
Daniel Kuehn |
June 18, 2013 at 09:45 AM
The other obvious point to make, of course, is differential MPCs when we compare cutting checks to just going out and spending it.
Here are some responses:
June 18, 2013 at 11:20 AM
It seems to me that a concession to the fiscalists fails to take seriously the argument presented by Buchanan and Wagner in Democracy in Deficit: The Political Legacy of Lord Keynes. Permission to run deficits in bad times--even as a backstop--enables persistent deficits.
It is not enough to corral the horses; one must close the gate so they do not get out again.
Will Luther |
June 19, 2013 at 08:59 AM
The main problem with ngdp targeting is the long lags between policy and effect. The lags can be up to five years according to some econometric studies. But the Fed can't predict with any accuracy the ngdp two quarters out, and neither can anyone else. That guarantees Fed policy will continue to be pro-cyclical.
Roger McKinney |
June 19, 2013 at 10:37 AM
The BIS does a pretty good job of trashing the consensus: http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2013/06/sermon-basel
Roger McKinney |
June 23, 2013 at 07:35 PM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Professor Peter T. Leeson: Anarchy Unbound: Why Self-Governance Works Better Than You Think (Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society)
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Coyne & Leeson: Media, Development, and Institutional Change (New Thinking in Political Economy Series)
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Christopher Coyne: After War: The Political Economy of Exporting Democracy (Stanford Economics & Finance)
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke and David Prytchitko: Market Process Theories
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Frederic Sautet: An Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics