|Peter Boettke|
Dalibor Rohac discusses this important question in ths paper just published in Economic Affairs (February 2013).
What would you list as the most important lessons to be learned from this experience?
« The Rule of Law and Economic Policy | Main | Changes at the Review of Austrian Economics -- Editorial Board »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451eb0069e2017ee8743f65970d
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference What Are the Lessons Learned From Post-Communism?:
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics
The importance of the legal and moral framework which were practically obliterated for several generations in Russia and then attacked for a shorter period in the captured states after WW2.
The rate of rebound after the Fall of the Wall is probably proportional to the amount of those frameworks that survived. The legal framework is fairly visible but the moral framework is largely invisible and very much related to religion.
The problem for secular humanists like many of us, is to maintain the moral framework without religion, especially when it is under attack from Big Government and the Welfare State. Thanks to Dr Benjamin Carson for his strong statement in defence.
Posted by: Rafe Champion | February 12, 2013 at 04:43 PM
Very interesting analysis of the results of shock therapy. We have also seen 30 years of gradualism in China. China has had great economic success, but it appears that gradualism and not shock therapy will reverse things. The Communist party has hijacked the process and is claiming all of the credit.
Other research on the transition economies shows the extreme importance of property rights in attracting investment to enabled growth.
Posted by: Roger McKinney | February 16, 2013 at 09:49 PM