December 2014

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
Blog powered by Typepad

« Krugman's Misreading of US Banking History | Main | Here is a riddle. Who said this? »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451eb0069e20168ebae239f970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference A Special Issue Of Public Choice On The Intellectual Legacy of Gordon Tullock:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Yttersåle som er i kontakt med bakken lag, litt hardere tekstur, slitasje sklisikkert funksjon. Faktisk har hver MBT joggesko sølv-hvite sin respektive teknologi og funksjoner.

I think the most you can say about the Peltzman effect is that the ipnmovemerts in health that result from ipnmovemerts in safety may be less than you expect. I've never understood the Peltzman effect arguments for precisely this reason. Because I think you're exactly right here: You should expect less of an improvement in safety from ipnmovemerts/regulation than you would holding everything constant. Or, in other words, there's a substitution effect. But why is there any reason to expect total substitution, or risk-level targeting? Or is there something I'm missing? Wouldn't a "full" Peltzman effect require some pretty bizarre assumptions about people's appetite for risk/utility for safety?

The comments to this entry are closed.