|Peter Boettke|
Simon Johnson learned how to become an economist studying the collapse of a system --- the Soviet economy --- and the attempts to rebuild that system into a viable market economy. This eventually lead him to focus on the important role of institutions within economic development. In recent years, his focus has turned from the broad question of the unpacking of institutions toward a critique of the US system of crony capitalism. And he is often a bold and biting critic.
He has a new book coming out taking on the fiscal situation in the US. In my opinion, he raises the questions which we as economist must be debating, even if I find myself in disagreement with him on certain key issues.
I wonder if Simon has thought about the situation in the Soviet Union in the 1980s that started his economic career, and the situation with the fiscal imbalance we face today. This question might strike many as strange, but I am thinking in particular of the work of Igor Birman concerning the "imbalances" in the Soviet system. I think a very productive discussion among economist could be had from such a revisiting of Birman's work and its potential applicability to the vulnerabilities with the social democratic systems of the West, including the US, in the past decade. Vito Tanzi's Government versus the Market (Cambrdige, 2011) is also a highly relevant resource for any discussion along these lines.