Peter Klein addresses the question as to whether the financial crisis represents the end of laissez-faire. Klein simply looks at the regulatory and spending behavior of the federal government over the past few decades. What laissez-faire have we had?
Excellent Peter. Keep up the great work.
From one Peter to another, I thank you. Waiting now for the comments from Lewin, Leeson, etc.
Posted by: Peter G. Klein | January 29, 2010 at 04:27 PM
It is time for a serious discussion on the extent to which a model of free markets is applicable. It is certainly not in finance and banking, where corporatism has taken hold. Healthcare? The auto industry? The rating agencies? Dare I ask, the universities?
Posted by: Jerry O'Driscoll | January 29, 2010 at 09:26 PM
Measuring in such a gross manner doesn't give a clear picture in this case. It was in great part that the two parties in a contract had the ability to lie, and that there wasn't recourse in the legal system or third party oversight when fraud was commited or during the act of commiting the fraud. The correction of the fraud was the bursting of the bubble. Even Greenspan admitted that the market didn't correct for fraud in the CDO/CDS case. So it is a case of wrong regulation not of simply regulation.
Posted by: Gerry Van Winkle | January 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM
The Buttonwood column in the Jan. 30 issue of The Economist has a good article on "the unintended consequences of past financial reforms," including the Basel rules. It asks what are the unintended consequences of proposed financial reforms?
Posted by: Bill Stepp | January 30, 2010 at 01:56 PM