November 2015

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30          
Blog powered by Typepad

« Bill Easterly and NYU's Development Research Institute (DRI) Wins Frontier of Knowledge Award | Main | The Great Recalculation Visualized »


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Nice job, Pete - some of the comments are hilarious. (One even accused you of journalism!)

Prof Leeson,

I enjoyed the paper a great deal, but I have to admit that I was disappointed to learn that "getting medieval on [one's] a**" involves neither blow torches nor pliars, but rather insufficiently heated coals, lukewarm boiling water, and rigged state-fair-like dunk-tanks.


Either she's a witch or everyone gets duck soup. Both possible outcomes are desirable. That's what I call institution design.

So if medieval "justice" was a bootstrap equilibrium, i.e. worked through self-validating beliefs, does this imply that the same could be true of a Keynesian macroeconomic "stimulus" program? Discuss.

The comments to this entry are closed.