« Ladies and Gentlemen, Won't You Please Welcome... |
| "Just Give Us New Jersey" »
Posted by Dave Prychitko on August 11, 2009 at 09:32 AM | Permalink
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
What is your judgement of how accurate Leijonhufvud's observations are for the world of the econ today? I think they were spot on in 1970-1980s economics. But what about the world we occupy today? Has life among the econ evolved or stagnated?
Peter Boettke |
August 11, 2009 at 10:21 AM
Right, Pete. This story held when IS-LM was in fashion -- the totem against the S-D totem. It was a fun way of seeing the differences within macro/micro back then, but it doesn't hold today and most students probably wouldn't get it. It works, though, as a piece in the history of thought.
Dave Prychitko |
August 11, 2009 at 12:28 PM
Thanks Dave! It works best if you realise how well he has captured the jargon of the tribe of anthropologists, or at least one of the clans. Non-economists can enjoy the beginning but tend to get lost when it gets more technical.
Rafe Champion |
August 11, 2009 at 07:21 PM
I disagree that students today wouldn't get the S/D and IS/LM totem distinction. IS/LM is still taught in intermediate micro classes the world over, and has a strong presence in popular texts like Mankiw.
I think it is interesting to talk to undergraduates from other fields who have had experience with economics beyond intro but have not delved too deep. My general impression is that they see micro and macroeconomics as completely separate disciplines with basically no overlap.
I believe that the econ have evolved considerably. But one would not necessarily think that was the case judging by the commonly used resources the econ have created to communicate their culture to outsiders. The micro-macro caste distinction still dominates there, and is not helped by some of the most vocal and influential econ (sometimes, but not always, of the macro caste) making prophecies (with the support of the priestly caste, of course) that clearly contradicts the fundamental observations of the micro.
Zac Gochenour |
August 12, 2009 at 08:40 AM
The comments to this entry are closed.
Professor Peter T. Leeson: Anarchy Unbound: Why Self-Governance Works Better Than You Think (Cambridge Studies in Economics, Choice, and Society)
Peter J. Boettke: Living Economics: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow
Christopher Coyne: Doing Bad by Doing Good: Why Humanitarian Action Fails
Paul Heyne, Peter Boettke, David Prychitko: Economic Way of Thinking, The (12th Edition)
Steven Horwitz: Microfoundations and Macroeconomics: An Austrian Perspective
Boettke & Aligica: Challenging Institutional Analysis and Development: The Bloomington School
Coyne & Leeson: Media, Development, and Institutional Change (New Thinking in Political Economy Series)
Peter T. Leeson: The Invisible Hook: The Hidden Economics of Pirates
Christopher Coyne: After War: The Political Economy of Exporting Democracy (Stanford Economics & Finance)
Philippe Lacoude and Frederic Sautet (Eds.): Action ou Taxation
Peter Boettke and David Prytchitko: Market Process Theories
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek
Peter Boettke: The Political Economy of Soviet Socialism: the Formative Years, 1918-1928
Peter Boettke: Calculation and Coordination: Essays on Socialism and Transitional Political Economy
Frederic Sautet: An Entrepreneurial Theory of the Firm
Peter Boettke & Peter Leeson (Eds.): The Legacy of Ludwig Von Mises
Peter Boettke: Why Perestroika Failed: The Politics and Economics of Socialist Transformation
Peter Boettke (Ed.): The Elgar Companion to Austrian Economics